The landslide victory of Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel’s elections has left Comrade Obama in a venomous rage.

Obama is so enraged that his efforts to undermine Netanyahu’s reelection at taxpayer expense backfired, that he now wants to use the United Nations to force Israel to sign on to its own demise.

The only reason Obama wanted to see Netanyahu lose was because Netanyahu was telling the world about Obama’s eagerness to sign on to a nuclear deal with Iran. Netanyahu knows that any deal with Iran will allow them to nuke up, which means curtains for the Jewish state.

Netanyahu actually had the nerve to defy Obama’s desperate efforts to deal with the world’s leading state sponsor of terror and Obama wants to force Bibi and his nation to pay the price.

Obama has sided with Iran and is willing to jeopardize the survival of Israel and the rest of the world to get a deal.

The president is also indignant that people would challenge his rush to a bad deal and is now willing to use the UN to force Israel to accept a “two-state solution” to their problems with the “Palestinians.” And now, Obama is upset with the French government because the French are taking the hardest line against Iran.

There has always been a strain of the American Left that has hated Israel and sided with Israel’s enemies.

Obama can easily be identified as a part of that strain having spent most of his life seeking alliances (seeking being the key word) with raging anti-Semites. Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, and Rashid Khalidi are three that easily come to mind.

Jeff Dunetz (Yid With Lid) has compiled a more thorough list of Obama’s anti-Semitic alliances from over the years.

And now this is compounded because Obama is trying to pretend he stands against a nuclear Iran, even though this deal would drop all the sanctions against Iran, allow them to enrich uranium and keep 6,000 centrifuges.

David Ibsen, Executive Director of the watchdog group, United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), told The Algemeiner (a Jewish newspaper) this week that 6,000 centrifuges is not enough for a peaceful nuclear program. It is, however, enough to build a nuclear bomb.

Think about that number of centrifuges for a moment, folks.

The administration claims that Iran is seeking nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, that they just want the energy to run their country. But if what Ibsen told The Algemeiner is true, then that claim is blown out of of the water.

If the deal allows for Iran to keep 6,000 centrifuges, there’s no way it can be a peaceful energy program because one can’t be sustained with 6,000 centrifuges.

And if this is in fact the case, why would Obama be seeking this deal?

Is he hopelessly naïve like Chamberlain? Or is there something more sinister involved?

Obama has spent his entire adult life in common cause with venomous Israel-haters and anti-Semites. And then there’s the matter of Obama’s friendship with Rashid Khalidi, who left Chicago in 2003 for New York to take a job at Columbia University.

There is a tape that the Los Angeles Times refuses to release to this date, of Obama toasting Khalidi, a well-known Israel-hater.

Roger L. Simon of PJ Media wrote back in 2010 (emphasis mine):

“Rashid Khalidi — a Palestinian-American historian known for his strong pro-Palestinian opinions — is currently the Edward Said Professor of Modern Arab Studies at Columbia and director of that university’s Middle East Institute.

After Khalidi received this Columbia appointment in 2003, a farewell dinner party was held in his honor in Chicago. A videotape was made of that party where many good things were said about the Palestinian cause and many bad things about Israel.

Then Illinois State Sen. Barack Obama was in attendance, as were, some say, William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.”

The contents of that tape could shed light on Obama’s undying contempt for the state of Israel, his eagerness to pursue a nuclear deal with Iran, and his willingness to use the UN to force Israel into accepting a “two-state solution” with the Palestinians.

Make no mistake, Obama wanted Netanyahu to lose reelection because he wanted an Israeli prime minister who would be less critical of his Monty Hall approach to Iran. Obama’s been rooting against Israel for his entire term of office.

Who can forget Obama’s call back in 2011 for Israel to return to the 1967 borders, which are entirely indefensible? Who can forget Obama and Hillary denouncing Israel for building in East Jerusalem during his first term?

Who can forget how Obama looked the other way when his friend Bill Ayers funded the flotilla, whose aims were to undermine the Israel blockage of Gaza so that they could sneak weapons into Gaza which could be used to attack Israel? Who can forget John Kerry’s 2014 accusation that Israel was an “apartheid state”?

Obama’s so wedded to the lunatic idea of dealing with Iran that he’s trying to cut Congress out of the deal, which would be a treaty, meaning it would need 67 Senators to be binding after he leaves office. There’s not a snowball’s chance in August that 67 Senators would ratify a deal with Iran regardless of the verbiage.

Obama knows Congress won’t pass his Iran deal, which is why he’s desperately trying to do an end-run around Legislative Branch. It’s also why the president’s slavish sycophants the media are accusing Senator Tom Cotton and 46 other Senators of treason for writing a letter to Iran reminding them of Congress’ constitutional role in this process.

For Obama, it’s about him looking like the hero and also in the process, undercutting Israel and the United States by extension.

Obama has made it abundantly clear which side he’s on. May God help us all.